Click here to email for more information   Collingwood Learner Driver Insurance

Freeze Taxi fares!?!?

by Site Admin. on July 11, 2009 · 2 comments

in Financial,Posts Contributions,Taxi News

Share

I’ve been reading a lot about ‘Fare increases’ in the Taxi world lately. Some people think that the answer to Credit Crunch, recession or whatever you want to call it is to raise prices. I think this is a mistake. Any short term gains through increasing fares are quickly evened out by lost custom.

Looking around the Country we, Taxi drivers, are sitting about doing nothing. Longer waiting times between fares & less people going out and using Taxis coupled with the high price of fuel has had a devastating effect on the Taxi trade. Another factor is the Government obsession with de-limitation of Taxis, every city and town across the country is under pressure to issue more and more licences. As more licences are issued then the work gets even thinner, standards drop, vehicle repairs and maintenance do not get done and so then we have spot checks, the resulting policies from poor maintenance and spot checks is to put an age limit on vehicles used for Taxis.

It’s a bit of a mess and not entirely of our own making. The one place where the Taxi trade can have a positive effect is on ‘Fares Charged’ Many Private hire firms, as we know, are cheaper to use than a Hackney Carriage and as such normally would take a reasonable share of the market. At the moment they are taking a larger share due to the recession, of course people will change their budgets and cut back on spending during hard times, but Private Hire is suffering too. Drivers of Private Hire have also taken a drop in earnings this last year.

We had an increase last December 2008, of 10p per mile. We did this because there is a formula in place with our council which keeps us in pace with inflation. 10p was negligible to the customer and only slightly beneficial to us. Despite this very low increase we have still lost more customers to the lower priced Private Hire. This has been helped along by aggressive marketing by some Private Hire companies, weekly full page ads in local newspapers and strategically placed signs stating how much can be saved by using them as opposed to a black Taxi.Save 140

‘We do not Market ourselves’ actually we do but we don’t realise it. Every time we make an impression on a passenger that is marketing. The problem is because we are not aware of this, sometimes that impression can be a negative one and we should take care that we ‘impress’ our customers in a positive way, by not moaning because it is a short ride, by being helpful and courteous to our passengers, by not overcharging (it is well known that we are entitled to charge extras for hand luggage, each passenger in excess of two,dogs,buggies & bicycles etc) we should use extras wisely and not as an excuse to bump up the fare.

We should also think about the possibility of freezing our fares and any future fare increases should be well thought out. Private Hire companies have lower fares than us anyway and as such will have to do a lot more work in order to make the same money or more than us. Office owners are already under pressure to raise their fares and will want to anyway as time goes by because that’s the only way they can raise their own income, by having a fare increase and then raising rents.

If the Hackney Carriage trade can put a Freeze on its fares then this will have the following effects.

  • New drivers coming in will be deterred due to the high cost of entry, expensive wheelchair accessible vehicles, high insurance, council fees etc.
  • Private Hire will eventually raise rates getting closer to the Hack rate, thus evening out the market somewhat.
  • As the fares between the two sectors grow closer to each other then people will not see such a difference and will inevitably use a Hack where at one time they would have waited in the rain to save a few pounds.

It’s a waiting game. We are being bitten from both ends. At one end we have Private Hire with no limits on numbers. Always increasing in size and taking more of the market share, which also increases the risk of Pirate drivers. At the other end we also have the risk of De-limitation of the Hackney Carriage trade which also decreases our market share; we have the constant risk of being fined for illegal parking due to the high numbers of Taxis and the low number of Rank spaces.

We now, more than ever before, have to think hard about the way we do business. Before we only had to jump in the Taxi and go to work where we made money. It’s not like that anymore but with a bit of togetherness and some sound thinking we can bring it back!

Possibly Related Posts:


 

Read More at Technorati on: aggressive marketing, budgets, credit crunch, earnings, fare increases, hackney carriage, poor maintenance, private hire, recession, spot checks, taxi drivers, Taxi Insurance, taxi trade, waiting times

More Stories:

{ 2 comments… read them below or add one }

thelighthousekeeper July 13, 2009 at 3:30 pm

As a qualified National Road Passenger Transport Management Certificate holder,I would like you to consider this option for the reasons I will explain below for the option being an acceptable compromise to your problem.

The Hackney Carriage Taxi(upto 8 passengers)Proprietor(s)can only apply for an increase in the Tariff Charges with the standard rule of thought being normally once a year for a review process for fares,as we cannot set our own maximum fares charges to apply except for through your Local Authority Council.

Unlike our Big Brother Hackney Carriage PCV(over 8 passengers)Companies who the Council(s)for Tyne and Wear decided under the Transport Act 1968 to set-up a Passenger Transport Executive to manage the Public Transport Network that was in place until 1986, and they had to apply through the PTE now NEXUS for the Tax year April and deferred October rises, that would apply to all bus operators on all services that used to operate on a Fare Stage/Zoning Point costing price standard charge for all service providers within Tyne and Wear, but after 1986 and the deregulation of the Hackney Carriage PCV Industry this saw the April and the deferred October rises only applied to Secured Services and Specialist Services, as well as the Metro System as these were the only accepted Public Transport Systems reconised by the PTE and NEXUS.

Still today in 2009, NEXUS do not accept the Hackney Carriage Taxi or Private Hire Operators,as part of Public Transport,but they do invite the two different “Hire or Reward” transport providers to attend(a lip service only)meeting to satisfy(the powers to be)I would conclude to be a kind way of summarising the current situation without offending both the Hackney Carriage Taxi and Private Hire Operators who attend such meetings in the hope of securing grant funding and subsidies etc……

MY OPTION FOR CONSIDERATION.
A common sense approach is needed for the annual percentage(inline with inflation)fare increase meeting with the Council that is to take place,with whatever the rise is to be requested as normal,but a request that if the Councillors approve any such rise,the rise will be requested to not apply until the Association or the Proprietors Representatives request that the stability of the economy has recovered sufficently for the rise to be implimented in your region,but should the economy not have recovered by the time the next annual fare increase meeting is to be held that any agreed increase on the previous years increase be incorporated into the new fare increase for that next year,that can again be withheld until the economy has recovered enough to sustain such a fare increase.

MY REASON FOR THE DEFERRAL OF IMPLIMENTATION INCREASE DATE REQUEST.
To adopt this frame of mind would mean the annual fare increase would not be lost for any future years to come when the economy may well have recovered sufficently to a point where the Hackney Carriage Proprietor(s) would have lost some annual fare increases,if they were not to have them approved yearly.
This would result in a very large inflation busting percentage increase in the rate needed to be applied for at a later date, that would probably see the Councillors refer to the fare increase as excessive at a later date meeting and the rise to be rejected by the Councillors at that Council meeting when ever that may be in the future.

Hope this has given you something to thing over when requesting a rise in these times of hardship in the local regions.

Reply to this commentReply to this comment
andy warhol July 12, 2009 at 7:15 pm

not sure about NT, but to raise the fares any more than they are in newcastle would be suicide for the trade!

the vast majority of drivers still think that the fares are a little expensive, and that freezing them till the end of the recession would be best for the trade.

it’s no good charging £100 per mile and then not having a customer to charge it to!

rumours on the rank are that someone requested that the council raise the fares! not sure what some people are trying to do to the trade…

Reply to this commentReply to this comment

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: